[PATCH v3 01/16] bitops: Change parity8() return type to bool
Jiri Slaby
jirislaby at kernel.org
Fri Mar 7 11:42:41 UTC 2025
On 07. 03. 25, 12:38, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06. 03. 25, 17:25, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
>>> Change return type to bool for better clarity. Update the kernel doc
>>> comment accordingly, including fixing "@value" to "@val" and adjusting
>>> examples. Also mark the function with __attribute_const__ to allow
>>> potential compiler optimizations.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x at gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x at gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/bitops.h | 10 +++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
>>> index c1cb53cf2f0f..44e5765b8bec 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
>>> @@ -231,26 +231,26 @@ static inline int get_count_order_long(unsigned long l)
>>> /**
>>> * parity8 - get the parity of an u8 value
>>> - * @value: the value to be examined
>>> + * @val: the value to be examined
>>> *
>>> * Determine the parity of the u8 argument.
>>> *
>>> * Returns:
>>> - * 0 for even parity, 1 for odd parity
>>> + * false for even parity, true for odd parity
>>
>> This occurs somehow inverted to me. When something is in parity means that
>> it has equal number of 1s and 0s. I.e. return true for even distribution.
>> Dunno what others think? Or perhaps this should be dubbed odd_parity() when
>> bool is returned? Then you'd return true for odd.
>
> OTOH:
>
> - '0' is an even number and is returned for even parity,
> - '1' is an odd number and is returned for odd parity.
Yes, that used to make sense for me. For bool/true/false, it no longer
does. But as I wrote, it might be only me...
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list