[PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: imx8qxp-ldb: cleanup return value

[Frank Li]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Liu,
>
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 14:42:12 +0800
> Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > On 03/07/2025, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > > 'ret' can only be 0 at this point, being preceded by a 'if (ret) return
> > > ret;'. So return 0 for clarity.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8qxp-ldb.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8qxp-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8qxp-ldb.c
> > > index 7bce2305d676714cdec7ce085cb53b25ce42f8e7..bee1c6002d5f84dc33b6d5dc123726703baa427e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8qxp-ldb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8qxp-ldb.c
> > > @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static int imx8qxp_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > >  	ldb_add_bridge_helper(ldb, &imx8qxp_ldb_bridge_funcs);
> > >
> > > -	return ret;
> > > +	return 0;
> >
> > I guess this is not the only place across the kernel tree where this cleanup
> > could be done.  So, maybe use some tools to cleanup them all?
>
> I had stumbled upon this as I was doing some changes to this function,
> and needed to understand the code flow. Definitely 'ret 0' would have
> made it  immediately clear that all the code between the last 'if (ret)
> return ret;' and the final 'return ret' is not allowed to fail.
>
> I think this change would (slightly, but still) improve future readers'
> life.

I think "return ret" at probe already become common sense for developer.
No value to take efforts to clean up this.

Frank

>
> Luca
>
> --
> Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com