[PATCH] drm/dp: Fix Write_Status_Update_Request AUX request format
Mario Limonciello
mario.limonciello at amd.com
Mon May 5 20:22:15 UTC 2025
On 4/27/2025 4:50 AM, Wayne Lin wrote:
> [Why]
> Notice AUX request format of I2C-over-AUX with
> Write_Status_Update_Request flag set is incorrect. It should
> be address only request without length and data like:
> "SYNC->COM3:0 (= 0110)|0000-> 0000|0000->
> 0|7-bit I2C address (the same as the last)-> STOP->".
>
> [How]
> Refer to DP v2.1 Table 2-178, correct the
> Write_Status_Update_Request to be address only request.
>
> Note that we might receive 0 returned by aux->transfer() when
> receive reply I2C_ACK|AUX_ACK of Write_Status_Update_Request
> transaction. Which indicating all data bytes get written.
> We should avoid to return 0 bytes get transferred under this
> case.
>
> Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain partial I2C_WRITE requests")
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello at amd.com>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 57828f2b7b5a..0c8cba7ed875 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1857,6 +1857,12 @@ static u32 drm_dp_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR;
> }
>
> +static inline bool
> +drm_dp_i2c_msg_is_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> +{
> + return ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE);
> +}
> +
> static void drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> /*
> @@ -1965,6 +1971,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(dp_aux_i2c_speed_khz,
> static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> unsigned int retry, defer_i2c;
> + struct drm_dp_aux_msg orig_msg = *msg;
> int ret;
> /*
> * DP1.2 sections 2.7.7.1.5.6.1 and 2.7.7.1.6.6.1: A DP Source device
> @@ -1976,6 +1983,12 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> int max_retries = max(7, drm_dp_i2c_retry_count(msg, dp_aux_i2c_speed_khz));
>
> for (retry = 0, defer_i2c = 0; retry < (max_retries + defer_i2c); retry++) {
> + if (drm_dp_i2c_msg_is_write_status_update(msg)) {
> + /* Address only transaction */
> + msg->buffer = NULL;
> + msg->size = 0;
> + }
> +
> ret = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
> if (ret < 0) {
> if (ret == -EBUSY)
> @@ -1993,7 +2006,7 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> else
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: transaction failed: %d\n",
> aux->name, ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
>
>
> @@ -2008,7 +2021,8 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> case DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_NACK:
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: native nack (result=%d, size=%zu)\n",
> aux->name, ret, msg->size);
> - return -EREMOTEIO;
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> + goto out;
>
> case DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER:
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: native defer\n", aux->name);
> @@ -2027,24 +2041,35 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> default:
> drm_err(aux->drm_dev, "%s: invalid native reply %#04x\n",
> aux->name, msg->reply);
> - return -EREMOTEIO;
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> switch (msg->reply & DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_MASK) {
> case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_ACK:
> + /*
> + * When I2C write firstly get defer and get ack after
> + * retries by wirte_status_update, we have to return
> + * all data bytes get transferred instead of 0.
> + */
> + if (drm_dp_i2c_msg_is_write_status_update(msg) && ret == 0)
> + ret = orig_msg.size;
> +
> /*
> * Both native ACK and I2C ACK replies received. We
> * can assume the transfer was successful.
> */
> if (ret != msg->size)
> drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(msg);
> - return ret;
> +
> + goto out;
>
> case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK:
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: I2C nack (result=%d, size=%zu)\n",
> aux->name, ret, msg->size);
> aux->i2c_nack_count++;
> - return -EREMOTEIO;
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> + goto out;
>
> case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_DEFER:
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: I2C defer\n", aux->name);
> @@ -2063,12 +2088,18 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> default:
> drm_err(aux->drm_dev, "%s: invalid I2C reply %#04x\n",
> aux->name, msg->reply);
> - return -EREMOTEIO;
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> + goto out;
> }
> }
>
> drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev, "%s: Too many retries, giving up\n", aux->name);
> - return -EREMOTEIO;
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> +out:
> + /* In case we change original msg by Write_Status_Update*/
As there are multiple cases that jump to the "out" label, would it be
clearer to use:
if (drm_dp_i2c_msg_is_write_status_update(msg)) {
msg->buffer = orig_msg.buffer;
msg->size = orig_msg.size;
}
return ret;
> + msg->buffer = orig_msg.buffer;
> + msg->size = orig_msg.size;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void drm_dp_i2c_msg_set_request(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg,
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list