[PATCH v1 5/5] misc: fastrpc: Add missing unmapping user-requested remote heap

Ekansh Gupta ekansh.gupta at oss.qualcomm.com
Thu May 22 05:01:34 UTC 2025



On 5/19/2025 7:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:28:34PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>>
>> On 5/19/2025 4:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:25AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>>>> User request for remote heap allocation is supported using ioctl
>>>> interface but support for unmap is missing. This could result in
>>>> memory leak issues. Add unmap user request support for remote heap.
>>> Can this memory be in use by the remote proc?
>> Remote heap allocation request is only intended for audioPD. Other PDs
>> running on DSP are not intended to use this request.
> 'Intended'. That's fine. I asked a different question: _can_ it be in
> use? What happens if userspace by mistake tries to unmap memory too
> early? Or if it happens intentionally, at some specific time during
> work.

If the unmap is restricted to audio daemon, then the unmap will only
happen if the remoteproc is no longer using this memory.

But without this restriction, yes it possible that some userspace process
calls unmap which tries to move the ownership back to HLOS which the
remoteproc is still using the memory. This might lead to memory access
problems.

>
>>>> Fixes: 532ad70c6d449 ("misc: fastrpc: Add mmap request assigning for static PD pool")
>>>> Cc: stable at kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>



More information about the dri-devel mailing list