[PATCH] drm/debugfs: add client-id to the debugfs entry
Khatri, Sunil
sukhatri at amd.com
Wed May 28 13:24:54 UTC 2025
Sure Pierre
Go ahead and get them merged. I am also planning to use that information
in debugfs implementation of some parameters of our driver so I do need
those. I will drop my debugfs patch.
Regards
Sunil Khatri
On 5/28/2025 6:32 PM, Christian König wrote:
> On 5/28/25 14:33, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch looks similar to:
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2025-May/507653.html
> Mhm, I thought that I have seen that before.
>
> Why haven't we pushed that yet? Is there still some ongoing reviews on the scheduler side?
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Pierre-Eric
>>
>> Le 28/05/2025 à 13:00, Christian König a écrit :
>>> Adding some people who worked on the client name and client id fields.
>>>
>>> On 5/28/25 09:22, Sunil Khatri wrote:
>>>> pid is not always the right choice for fd to track
>>>> the caller and hence adding drm client-id to the
>>>> print which is unique for a drm client and can be
>>>> used by driver in debugging
>>>>
>>>> One of the use is to further enhance debugging for
>>>> amdgpu driver based on client-id.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri<sunil.khatri at amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 9 +++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
>>>> index 6b2178864c7e..2d43bda82887 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
>>>> @@ -77,14 +77,15 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>>> kuid_t uid;
>>>> seq_printf(m,
>>>> - "%20s %5s %3s master a %5s %10s %*s\n",
>>>> + "%20s %5s %3s master a %5s %10s %*s %5s\n",
>>>> "command",
>>>> "tgid",
>>>> "dev",
>>>> "uid",
>>>> "magic",
>>>> DRM_CLIENT_NAME_MAX_LEN,
>>>> - "name");
>>>> + "name",
>>>> + "client-id");
>>> It might make sense to print the client id first and then the name.
>>>
>>> Apart from that looks sane to me.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> /* dev->filelist is sorted youngest first, but we want to present
>>>> * oldest first (i.e. kernel, servers, clients), so walk backwardss.
>>>> @@ -100,7 +101,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>>> pid = rcu_dereference(priv->pid);
>>>> task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>>>> uid = task ? __task_cred(task)->euid : GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
>>>> - seq_printf(m, "%20s %5d %3d %c %c %5d %10u %*s\n",
>>>> + seq_printf(m, "%20s %5d %3d %c %c %5d %10u %*s %5llu\n",
>>>> task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
>>>> pid_vnr(pid),
>>>> priv->minor->index,
>>>> @@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>>> from_kuid_munged(seq_user_ns(m), uid),
>>>> priv->magic,
>>>> DRM_CLIENT_NAME_MAX_LEN,
>>>> - priv->client_name ? priv->client_name : "<unset>");
>>>> + priv->client_name ? priv->client_name : "<unset>", priv->client_id);
>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> mutex_unlock(&priv->client_name_lock);
>>>> }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20250528/07828169/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list