<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231">bug 94231</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@fooishbar.org" title="Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>"> Daniel Stone</a> <pre>(In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94231#c3">comment #3</a>) > I.e. if the _BSD_SOURCE define does not help, then either glibc needs to be > fixed or the manuals should be updated (the glibc fold might have some > suggestions) ? _BSD_SOURCE gets defined if you call AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS from configure.ac, which gives you the maximal set of defines. It's not safe to just define the _*_SOURCE macros, since whilst glibc etc treat them as additive, BSD libcs treat them as restrictive (e.g. defining _BSD_SOURCE gives you a pure BSD environment without some of the features enabled by, e.g., _XOPEN_SOURCE).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>