<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231">bug 94231</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>(In reply to Daniel Stone from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94231#c4">comment #4</a>) > _BSD_SOURCE gets defined if you call AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS Are you sure about this ? Looking at my autoconf 2.69 (/usr/share/autoconf/autoconf/specific.m4) and it sets the following __EXTENSIONS__ _ALL_SOURCE _GNU_SOURCE _POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS _TANDEM_SOURCE Had no idea about the different interpretation of the defines between GNU vs BSD libc(s). Thanks for that. We can at check if the explicit define fixes things on Linux and ping the BSD people for more robust solution ?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>