<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Radeonsi on Grenada cards (r9 390) exceptionally unstable and poorly performing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91880#c110">Comment # 110</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Radeonsi on Grenada cards (r9 390) exceptionally unstable and poorly performing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91880">bug 91880</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:doublebytegames@gmail.com" title="Chris Waters <doublebytegames@gmail.com>"> Chris Waters</a> <pre>(In reply to John Bridgman from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91880#c108">comment #108</a>) > Chris, are you using the -k firmware files and associated kernel patches, > updated initrd if needed, etc... ? I have not for two reasons. 1. As Christoffer mentions, the _k firmware only seems good for the 390X 2. I'm unfamiliar with the process of doing such and the steps for doing it are spread across 100+ comments with no real sign of what steps are the right ones. > My impression is that a few different issues are being discussed in this one > ticket, and that is hampering progress. Not quite sure what the right split > would be (if we were to close this and replace with N more focused tickets) > but probably one of them should be for stability problems when running the > -k firmware and checking whether locking dpm level to performance makes a > difference. Still, these issues make using an 390 or 390X on Linux a nightmare. This issue isn't "minor" and its importance rating should reflect that. This is a major (or even critical) bug report, IMO. One that has been open for 10 months, I might add.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>