<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - gem_userptr_blits@mlocked-* should skip due to memory pre-condition not met"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95427#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - gem_userptr_blits@mlocked-* should skip due to memory pre-condition not met"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95427">bug 95427</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:christophe.prigent@intel.com" title="cprigent <christophe.prigent@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">cprigent</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=95427#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> Guys have you actually looked at the following line ?
> Aperture size is 268435456 MiB -- That is 256 TiB !!!
>
> That's rather impossible amount if you ask me. So there's either a bug in
> IGT's gem_aperture_size() or one of the two ioctls
> (I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM I915_GEM_GET_APERTURE) that it uses.
>
> With a couple of print statements you should be able to quickly track the
> exact offender. Good luck !</span >
Yes, we saw it. The bug is reported to IGT (not to DRM/Intel). We propose the
test should skip.
I just checked on our IVB platform with 32 GB of memory. Looks like we would
need now 2 TB.
root@IVB102:/opt/X11R7/src/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./gem_userptr_blits
--run-subtest mlocked-normal-sync
IGT-Version: 1.15-ge3abb20 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.7.0-nightly+ x86_64)
Aperture size is 2048 MiB
Total RAM is 31,945 MiB
Testing unsynchronized mappings...
Testing synchronized mappings...
Killed</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>