<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - gem_userptr_blits@mlocked-* should skip due to memory pre-condition not met" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95427#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - gem_userptr_blits@mlocked-* should skip due to memory pre-condition not met" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95427">bug 95427</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to cprigent from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=95427#c4">comment #4</a>) > (In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=95427#c3">comment #3</a>) > > Guys have you actually looked at the following line ? > > Aperture size is 268435456 MiB -- That is 256 TiB !!! > > > > That's rather impossible amount if you ask me. So there's either a bug in > > IGT's gem_aperture_size() or one of the two ioctls > > (I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM I915_GEM_GET_APERTURE) that it uses. > > > > With a couple of print statements you should be able to quickly track the > > exact offender. Good luck ! > > Yes, we saw it. The bug is reported to IGT (not to DRM/Intel). We propose > the test should skip. Why? The test only allocates enough to fill RAM and then tests that the buffers are evicted for memory pressure. The messages are nothing to do with this test, just spam.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>