<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [Topaz] Regression introduces in 4.8-rc3"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98505#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [Topaz] Regression introduces in 4.8-rc3"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98505">bug 98505</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Alex Deucher</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Peter Wu from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98505#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> Ok, do you have any certainty about the earliest BIOS date where _PR3 is
> used? E.g. if the minimum date is lowered to 2014 without checking for _PR3,
> would it be likely to miss out some models?</span >
It's always used if it's available. I think 2014 should be ok (should catch
most of the early ones), but I'll check with our windows architects. I suspect
it will come down to OEM/ODMs.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>