<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - `radeon_ib_ring_tests` takes 0.5 s on resume" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100761#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - `radeon_ib_ring_tests` takes 0.5 s on resume" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100761">bug 100761</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net" title="Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>"> Paul Menzel</a> <pre>(In reply to Christian König from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100761#c2">comment #2</a>) > (In reply to Paul Menzel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100761#c0">comment #0</a>) > > Looking at the generated graph 540 ms is spent in `radeon_ib_ring_tests`, > > which contributes most of the time. > > > > It’d be awesome to improve these times. > > And impossible as well. UVD hardware startup just takes about 400-500ms on > the older boxes. No idea why. Interesting. What part is responsible for this? AtomBIOS? Does the UVD hardware need to start up before displaying something on the screen, or could it be moved to the user space driver? How long does it take on the new hardware?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>