<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - 2560x1440 @144Hz graphic glitches and bad refresh rate" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93826#c66">Comment # 66</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - 2560x1440 @144Hz graphic glitches and bad refresh rate" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93826">bug 93826</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:iuno@posteo.net" title="iuno@posteo.net">iuno@posteo.net</a> <pre>(In reply to Alex Deucher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93826#c65">comment #65</a>) > > Yes, that is independent of the patch in <a href="attachment.cgi?id=131983" name="attach_131983" title="possible fix">attachment 131983</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=131983&action=edit" title="possible fix">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=93826&attachment=131983'>[review]</a> > [review]. The driver disables dynamic mclk switching for refresh rates > above 120 hz to avoid flickering. Yes, I know it prevents flickering. <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93826#c62">Comment #62</a> was a reply and I mentioned this as *another* problem (high power draw), independent from the fixed one. Do you know how this works on Windows? Do they increase voltage without raising clocks and could this be an option for amdgpu too?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>