<div dir="ltr">Hi Xinliang,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 28 August 2017 at 10:27, Xinliang Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:xinliang.liu@linaro.org" target="_blank">xinliang.liu@linaro.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Daniel,<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On 28 August 2017 at 16:51, Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch">daniel@ffwll.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 04:44:30PM +0800, Xinliang Liu wrote:<br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> On 15 August 2017 at 22:14, Peter Griffin <<a href="mailto:peter.griffin@linaro.org">peter.griffin@linaro.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > This patch fixes the following soft lockup:<br>
>> > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [weston:307]<br>
>> ><br>
>> > On weston idle-timeout the IP is powered down and reset<br>
>> > asserted. On weston resume we get a massive vblank<br>
>> > IRQ storm due to the LDI registers having lost some state.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > This state loss is caused by ade_crtc_atomic_begin() not<br>
>> > calling ade_ldi_set_mode(). With this patch applied<br>
>> > resuming from Weston idle-timeout works well.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <<a href="mailto:peter.griffin@linaro.org">peter.griffin@linaro.org</a>><br>
>> > Tested-by: John Stultz <<a href="mailto:john.stultz@linaro.org">john.stultz@linaro.org</a>><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> Thanks Peter,<br>
>> This patch looks good to me.<br>
>> Reviewed-by: Xinliang Liu <<a href="mailto:xinliang.liu@linaro.org">xinliang.liu@linaro.org</a>><br>
>><br>
>> @Sean, could you please help to apply to drm-misc if others has no more<br>
>> comments, thanks.<br>
><br>
> hisilicon isn't maintained in drm-misc, and you're the maintainer. This is<br>
> not how it works. So either<br>
> a) pick up the patch and send out a pull request to Dave Airlie<br>
> b) move hisilicon over to drm-misc and become a drm-misc maintainer<br>
> yourself. This needs a MAINTAINERS update to point the git tree at<br>
> drm-misc.<br>
><br>
> drm-misc maintainers don't maintain everyone else's driver as a service,<br>
> that simply doesn't scale.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Sorry for my misunderstanding and thanks for pointing out that how<br>
drm-misc works.<br>
So I will pick up the patch and send a pull request.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Did you send the pull request?</div><div><br></div><div>I still can't see this patch in the latest kernel RC.</div><div><br></div><div>Peter.</div></div></div></div>