<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Max core profile version: 0.0 in the "Drivers/DRI/r300" component of the "Mesa"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103506#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Max core profile version: 0.0 in the "Drivers/DRI/r300" component of the "Mesa"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103506">bug 103506</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Hi-Angel@yandex.ru" title="Hi-Angel <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>"> Hi-Angel</a> <pre>> Technically it's not the "compatibility" profile until GL 3.2 rolls around, but in essence yes. An implementation would probably not expose GLX_ARB_create_context_profile, but if it did, such requests would fail. I shall say, my OpenGL-fu not very good, but this looks like a mess. Using GLX_ARB_create_context_profile is generally the expected way of using OpenGL, right? Then, the only way to use r300g is to ask compatibility or to query every possible extension separately. The first one we don't want apps to do, and the second one hardly would be used by anyone because, at least, core profile is expected to be present. So, after all, it's bug, right?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>