<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - amd-staging-drm-next-git 4.16 & RX 560 DL-DVI: corruption with refreshrates >73Hz when DPM changing VRAM clock"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105300#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - amd-staging-drm-next-git 4.16 & RX 560 DL-DVI: corruption with refreshrates >73Hz when DPM changing VRAM clock"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105300">bug 105300</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:harry.wentland@amd.com" title="Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>"> <span class="fn">Harry Wentland</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Are you messing with TMDS_MAX_PIXEL_CLOCK as Andrew is doing in this ticket:
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [DC] - Maximum pixel clock of dual-link DVI too low for some modes"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=105302">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105302</a> ?
With DC clock switching might happen more aggressively which could explain the
underflow you're seeing.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>