<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BISECTED] EDID read failure breaks display mirroring"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107390#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BISECTED] EDID read failure breaks display mirroring"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107390">bug 107390</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jb5sgc1n.nya@20mm.eu" title="dwagner <jb5sgc1n.nya@20mm.eu>"> <span class="fn">dwagner</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Harry Wentland from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107390#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> That commit is correct. I don't think we should revert it. That said I don't
> quite understand why it leads to issues.</span >
Isn't it strange that dc_link_detect goes on when
edid_status==EDID_BAD_CHECKSUM but does return when
edid_status==EDID_NO_RESPONSE? In both cases, one cannot expect to have read a
valid EDID from the display at hand, but if it's ok to continue with an invalid
EDID, why not also continue without one having been received?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>