<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression, bisected] arb_texture_multisample texelfetch piglit test failing on NIR backend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109265#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression, bisected] arb_texture_multisample texelfetch piglit test failing on NIR backend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109265">bug 109265</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:t_arceri@yahoo.com.au" title="Timothy Arceri <t_arceri@yahoo.com.au>"> Timothy Arceri</a> <pre>This is odd. As far as I can tell the shader variant produced after loading from the case is the same as the one produced when the cache is disabled. Its also a fairly simple program. From tests/texturing/shaders/texelFetch.c the offending program is: int vs = piglit_compile_shader_text(GL_VERTEX_SHADER, "#version 130\n" "#extension GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location: require\n" "layout(location=0) in vec4 pos;\n" "void main() {\n" " gl_Position = pos;\n" "}\n"); (void)!asprintf(&fs_code, "#version 130\n" "#extension GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location: require\n" "#extension GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions: require\n" "uniform int layer;\n" "uniform int si;\n" "layout(pixel_center_integer) in vec4 gl_FragCoord;\n" "layout(location=0) out %s o;\n" "void main() {\n" " o = %s(%sgl_FragCoord.x, gl_FragCoord.y, layer, si);\n" "}\n", sampler.return_type, sampler.return_type, sampler.data_type == GL_UNSIGNED_INT ? "" : "-"); We must not be setting a flag somewhere, but I've looked over the code that handles the cache multiple time now and can't spot any real difference between tgsi and nir.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>