<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - qemu using spice gl and sandbox resourcecontrol=deny crashes with SIGSYS on radeonsi"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109695#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - qemu using spice gl and sandbox resourcecontrol=deny crashes with SIGSYS on radeonsi"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109695">bug 109695</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Alex Deucher</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Daniel P. Berrange from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109695#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">>
> I'm curious what motivated this change to start with ? Even if QEMU was not
> enforcing seccomp filters, I think I'd consider it a bug for mesa to be
> setting its process affinity in this way. The mgmt application or sysadmin
> has decided that the process must have a certain affinity, based on how
> it/they want the host CPUs utilized. Why is mesa wanting to override this
> administrative policy decision to restrict CPU usage ?</span >
To improve performance on modern multi-core NUMA architectures.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>