<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Radeon: heavy r300 performance drop regression between 11.x and 19.x"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110781#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Radeon: heavy r300 performance drop regression between 11.x and 19.x"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110781">bug 110781</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:u9vata@gmail.com" title="Richard Thier <u9vata@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Richard Thier</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Sorry! I have to add that the above printf only prints as such if I use my
hacky patch on latest git! I will try what it says with the "proposed fix"
patch of Marek as the body of radeon_get_heap_index seems to need
RADEON_FLAG_NO_INTERPROCESS_SHARING so the above might be misleading without me
telling what are the exact circumstances.
But the assert I was running into even with the proposed fix - just I wanted to
try if there is a difference between the hacky fix and the normal one in the
assert appearing or not...</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>