<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HyperZ is broken for r300 (bad z for some micro and macrotiles?)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110897#c48">Comment # 48</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HyperZ is broken for r300 (bad z for some micro and macrotiles?)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110897">bug 110897</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:u9vata@gmail.com" title="Richard Thier <u9vata@gmail.com>"> Richard Thier</a> <pre>Btw I saw that mesa codes handle my RC410 as one having RV350 (is_rv350 is true), but unlike R400 family chip. I have no idea if that is right, but if the kernel part do differently than the userland part that is clearly wrong that is sure! I kind of have a feeling this card is closer to R300 family than R400, but these are the questions that I have problems answering myself :-( In any ways. I think the wrong rXX_start function is called and r300_start shoud have been called instead in my case originally... Now I am looking where to fix this as it seems like an easy patch after properly finding the issue source. Actually if this is the case I am only lucky that this manifests itself only in this subtle details because that means a whole minor family different code is running for my card and it takes only luck that it works...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>