<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110967">110967</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>DRI
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>Other
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>medium
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>DRM/AMDgpu-pro
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>ashark@linuxcomp.ru
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roct-amdgpu-pro and
roct-amdgpu-pro-dev.
They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix.
Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary
packages should have that suffix.
Also there are packages:
amf-amdgpu-pro
opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr
opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev
opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip
What about their suffixes?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>