<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Rx480 consumes 20w more power in idle than under Windows" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110865#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Rx480 consumes 20w more power in idle than under Windows" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110865">bug 110865</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> Alex Deucher</a> <pre>(In reply to Martin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110865#c6">comment #6</a>) > Sadly it did not help. > the MCLK is still fixed at 2000MHz. > > How can I verify that I did everything correctly? You can add a printk to the patch to verify that it's being applied. Maybe print the value of hwmgr->display_config->multi_monitor_in_sync to see if the monitors are synced or not. > I just rebuilt Kernel 5.2.6 from Fedoras srpm and added the patch in the > spec file. > > Or could it be that I have two different 1920x1200 screens? one from HP and > one from Dell? That is likely the issue. If the timings for the displays are slightly different, they won't be synced. It could also be that the DC code doesn't set the multi_monitor_in_sync flag properly.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>