<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482">bug 111482</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:asheldon55@gmail.com" title="Andrew Sheldon <asheldon55@gmail.com>"> Andrew Sheldon</a> <pre>I just did some more tests, and in my case, it wasn't strictly the refresh rate, but the timings being too aggressive (which I needed to do to lower the pixel clock enough due to driver limits, which are quite conservative). This wasn't as much of a problem with Vega, since the idle power usage was about the same (12-15W), but it is with Navi. I will also add that during my tests, I found it was possible to leave the system in a state where I couldn't leave the high memclock/power usage situation after a while, even when switching to 60hz, requiring a reboot. So that might be what is happening on your system, Robert.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>