<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482">bug 111482</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to Robert from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111482#c12">comment #12</a>) > At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool > if one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a > resolution of 5144x1440 the card always runs at highest memory clock speed > as it does with a multi monitor setup (from what I've read so far). [Note, I'm not an AMD engineer.] In some monitors, such high modes are actually exposed by presenting multiple "tiles" as separate screens. As far as the GPU is concerned, it's 2 actual monitors (this can only work with DisplayPort, of course). Can you check if this is the case? I believe "xrandr" should report 2 separate monitors in this situation. You mention you have a 49WL95C-W, which the internet suggests is indeed just 2 panels placed next to each other in a nice plastic case. And in such cases, I believe the AMD drivers clock to the highest rate, since reclocks will cause flickering (since the vsync's of the 2 monitors aren't sync'd to one another).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>