<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482#c35">Comment # 35</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482">bug 111482</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:asheldon55@gmail.com" title="Andrew Sheldon <asheldon55@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Andrew Sheldon</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Dieter Nützel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111482#c34">comment #34</a>)
<span class="quote">> Which I couldn't verify on my Polaris system (with 2 identical HDMI
> monitors) currently.
> With 'low' and 2 identical HDMI displays I get the below under
> 'amd-staging-drm-next':
>
> GFX Clocks and Power:
> 300 MHz (MCLK)
> 300 MHz (SCLK)
> 600 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
> 1000 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
> 750 mV (VDDGFX)
> 32.174 W (average GPU)
>
> PSTATE_SCLK and PSTATE_MCLK do NOT drop and much to high W.
> NO flickering due to 'low'.
>
> I'll point Alex to this thread.</span >
You need to revert f6505e375fe8 , which "fixed" the flickering bug (but
prevents the lower power consumption behaviour).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>