<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - AMD Navi GPU frequent freezes on both Manjaro/Ubuntu with kernel 5.3 and mesa 19.2 -git/llvm9" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481#c230">Comment # 230</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - AMD Navi GPU frequent freezes on both Manjaro/Ubuntu with kernel 5.3 and mesa 19.2 -git/llvm9" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481">bug 111481</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:danielsuarez369@protonmail.com" title="Daniel Suarez <danielsuarez369@protonmail.com>"> Daniel Suarez</a> <pre>(In reply to John Smith from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111481#c225">comment #225</a>) > (In reply to Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=111481#c141">comment #141</a>) > > > For radeonsi the AMD_DEBUG=nodma environment variable is a workaround until > > we figure out a proper fix. > > Is this seriously what AMD calls "support"? No offense but this is > ridiculous, this card has been out for four months and it still can't even > browse firefox reliably, even after these "workarounds" and "patches". > > Then we waited two months for the drivers to even get properly released, and > all this wait was for nothing because the drivers are useless, you can't > even browse firefox or let alone play any actual games. What is the point of > having open source drivers if they don't even work? Nvidia's GPUs have had > day one support, and unlike AMD, "support" actually means the GPU works for > something that is meaningful. I wouldn't really call what is happening here "support". Really feels like us Linux users were thrown to the side with little consideration.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>