<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>I don't think i can apply this patch 'as is' as this has
dependency on patch by Steven which also wasn't applied yet -
588b982 Steven Price 6 weeks ago drm: Don't free jobs in
wait_event_interruptible()</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Andrey<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/3/19 2:44 PM, Deucher, Alexander
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MWHPR12MB13589D76D1F7D518FE7D6F08F7420@MWHPR12MB1358.namprd12.prod.outlook.com">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
<p style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;color:#0078D7;margin:15pt;" align="Left">
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]<br>
</p>
<br>
<div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Please go ahead an apply whatever version is necessary for
amd-staging-drm-next.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Alex</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b>
Grodzovsky, Andrey <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com"><Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:10 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Deng, Emily <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Emily.Deng@amd.com"><Emily.Deng@amd.com></a>; Deucher,
Alexander <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Alexander.Deucher@amd.com"><Alexander.Deucher@amd.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"><dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org></a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org">amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"><amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org></a>; Koenig, Christian
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Christian.Koenig@amd.com"><Christian.Koenig@amd.com></a>; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steven.price@arm.com">steven.price@arm.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:steven.price@arm.com"><steven.price@arm.com></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid
accessing freed bad job.</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Yes - Christian just pushed it to
drm-next-misc - I guess Alex/Christian
<br>
didn't pull to amd-staging-drm-next yet.<br>
<br>
Andrey<br>
<br>
On 12/2/19 2:24 PM, Deng, Emily wrote:<br>
> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution
Only]<br>
><br>
> Hi Andrey,<br>
> Seems this patch is still not in
amd-staging-drm-next?<br>
><br>
> Best wishes<br>
> Emily Deng<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: Deng, Emily<br>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 4:41 PM<br>
>> To: Grodzovsky, Andrey
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com"><Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com></a><br>
>> Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org">amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org</a>; Koenig,<br>
>> Christian <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Christian.Koenig@amd.com"><Christian.Koenig@amd.com></a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steven.price@arm.com">steven.price@arm.com</a><br>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid
accessing freed bad job.<br>
>><br>
>> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution
Only]<br>
>><br>
>> Reviewed-by: Emily Deng
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Emily.Deng@amd.com"><Emily.Deng@amd.com></a><br>
>><br>
>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>> From: Grodzovsky, Andrey
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com"><Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com></a><br>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:37 AM<br>
>>> Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org">amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org</a>;<br>
>>> Koenig, Christian
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Christian.Koenig@amd.com"><Christian.Koenig@amd.com></a>; Deng, Emily<br>
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Emily.Deng@amd.com"><Emily.Deng@amd.com></a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steven.price@arm.com">steven.price@arm.com</a><br>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler:
Avoid accessing freed bad job.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Ping<br>
>>><br>
>>> Andrey<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 11/25/19 3:51 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky
wrote:<br>
>>>> Problem:<br>
>>>> Due to a race between
drm_sched_cleanup_jobs in sched thread and<br>
>>>> drm_sched_job_timedout in timeout work
there is a possiblity that bad<br>
>>>> job was already freed while still being
accessed from the timeout<br>
>>>> thread.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Fix:<br>
>>>> Instead of just peeking at the bad job
in the mirror list remove it<br>
>>>> from the list under lock and then put
it back later when we are<br>
>>>> garanteed no race with main sched
thread is possible which is after<br>
>>>> the thread is parked.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> v2: Lock around processing
ring_mirror_list in drm_sched_cleanup_jobs.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> v3: Rebase on top of drm-misc-next. v2
is not needed anymore as<br>
>>>> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job already has a
lock there.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> v4: Fix comments to relfect latest code
in drm-misc.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com"><andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com></a><br>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:christian.koenig@amd.com"><christian.koenig@amd.com></a><br>
>>>> Tested-by: Emily Deng
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Emily.Deng@amd.com"><Emily.Deng@amd.com></a><br>
>>>> ---<br>
>>>>
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 27<br>
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br>
>>>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> diff --git
a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c<br>
>>>>
b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c<br>
>>>> index 6774955..1bf9c40 100644<br>
>>>> ---
a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c<br>
>>>> +++
b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c<br>
>>>> @@ -284,10 +284,21 @@ static void
drm_sched_job_timedout(struct<br>
>>> work_struct *work)<br>
>>>> unsigned long flags;<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> sched = container_of(work, struct
drm_gpu_scheduler,<br>
>>>> work_tdr.work);<br>
>>>> +<br>
>>>> + /* Protects against concurrent
deletion in<br>
>>> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job */<br>
>>>> +
spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);<br>
>>>> job =
list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list,<br>
>>>>
struct drm_sched_job, node);<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> if (job) {<br>
>>>> + /*<br>
>>>> + * Remove the bad job so it
cannot be freed by concurrent<br>
>>>> + * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs.
It will be reinserted back after<br>
>>> sched->thread<br>
>>>> + * is parked at which point
it's safe.<br>
>>>> + */<br>
>>>> +
list_del_init(&job->node);<br>
>>>> +
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock,
flags);<br>
>>>> +<br>
>>>>
job->sched->ops->timedout_job(job);<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> /*<br>
>>>> @@ -298,6 +309,8 @@ static void
drm_sched_job_timedout(struct<br>
>>> work_struct *work)<br>
>>>>
job->sched->ops->free_job(job);<br>
>>>>
sched->free_guilty = false;<br>
>>>> }<br>
>>>> + } else {<br>
>>>> +
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock,
flags);<br>
>>>> }<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
@@ -370,6 +383,20<br>
>>>> @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct
drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, struct<br>
>>> drm_sched_job *bad)<br>
>>>> kthread_park(sched->thread);<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> /*<br>
>>>> + * Reinsert back the bad job here -
now it's safe as<br>
>>>> + * drm_sched_get_cleanup_job cannot
race against us and release the<br>
>>>> + * bad job at this point - we parked
(waited for) any in progress<br>
>>>> + * (earlier) cleanups and
drm_sched_get_cleanup_job will not be<br>
>>> called<br>
>>>> + * now until the scheduler thread is
unparked.<br>
>>>> + */<br>
>>>> + if (bad && bad->sched ==
sched)<br>
>>>> + /*<br>
>>>> + * Add at the head of the
queue to reflect it was the earliest<br>
>>>> + * job extracted.<br>
>>>> + */<br>
>>>> + list_add(&bad->node,
&sched->ring_mirror_list);<br>
>>>> +<br>
>>>> + /*<br>
>>>> * Iterate the job list from later
to earlier one and either deactive<br>
>>>> * their HW callbacks or remove
them from mirror list if they already<br>
>>>> * signaled.<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>