State of EGL

[Brian Paul]

Juergen Obernolte wrote:
> Dave Airlie <airlied at ...> writes:
> 
> 
>>At this stage you've really only two choices, either use miniglx or
>>dri-egl, the only cards that I know work are radeon (r100/r200), and
>>I'm working on r300 for dri-egl slowly...
>>
>>miniglx is a dead-end path, I support it on hardware for a client, but
>>I'd seriously doubt it'll ever gain any new features..
>>
>>dri-egl is working for me running Xegl on radeon 9200 the last time I
>>tried it, I need to do some testing again on my 9200 for eglgears,
>>before I go back to getting the r300 going..
>>
>>Dave.
>>
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> So it seems that I have to wait until the development is advanced far enough to
> use dri-egl. Is at least the framebuffer driver working? Or are there some
> glitches with it too (I couldn't make it run)? Maybe I can help with the
> development?
> Besides, is there some better documentation about the infrastructure of
> Mesa/dri-egl than the one coming with the source? I've looked at the
> Mesa-Homepage too but there is also no good documentation. 

There's still some aspects of the EGL_MESA_screen_surface extensions 
that haven't been nailed down.  The 
Mesa/src/egl/docs/EGL_MESA_screen_surface file is the latest.

-Brian