[PATCH 1/3] drm/etnaviv: submit support for in-fences
Gustavo Padovan
gustavo at padovan.org
Fri Mar 17 13:55:37 UTC 2017
2017-03-16 Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo at padovan.org> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/etnaviv_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/etnaviv_drm.h
> >> index 2584c1cca42f6..e9c388a1d8ebe 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/drm/etnaviv_drm.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/etnaviv_drm.h
> >> @@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ struct drm_etnaviv_gem_submit_bo {
> >> * one or more cmdstream buffers. This allows for conditional execution
> >> * (context-restore), and IB buffers needed for per tile/bin draw cmds.
> >> */
> >> +#define ETNA_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT 0x0001
> >> +#define ETNA_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_IN 0x0002
> >
> > ETNA_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT and ETNA_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_IN are the same, when
> > you send and fence_fd to the kernel you are requesting on explicit sync
> > thus I think the ETNA_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT can be dropped and
> > ETNA_SUBMIT_FENCE_FD_IN would be the one to look at.
>
> jfwiw, I kept separate no-implicit and fence-fd-in flags in msm mostly
> because I couldn't think of a good backwards-compatible way to add it
> later if needed. Currently userspace sets both flags together, and
> possibly always will. But keeping separate flags seemed like a good
> idea for future-proofing..
Fair enough. Let's do the same for etnaviv then.
Gustavo
More information about the etnaviv
mailing list