[PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API

[Mike Rapoport]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:09:52AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't
> > > change.  Do we need to setup a reserved-memory node like
> > > imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi did?
> >
> > I don't think so.
> >
> > Were you able to identify what was the exact commit that caused such regression?
> 
> I was able to narrow it down the 92d12f9544b7 ("memblock: refactor
> internal allocation functions") that caused the regression with
> Etnaviv.


Can you please test with this change:

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 7d4f61a..1f5a0eb 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1356,9 +1356,6 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 		align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
 	}
 
-	if (end > memblock.current_limit)
-		end = memblock.current_limit;
-
 again:
 	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end, nid,
 					    flags);
 
> I also noticed that if I create a reserved memory node as was done one
> imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi the 3D seems to work again, but without it, I
> was getting errors regardless of the 'cma=256M' or not.
> I don't have a problem using the reserved memory, but I guess I am not
> sure what the amount should be.  I know for the video decoding 1080p,
> I have historically used cma=128M, but with the 3D also needing some
> memory allocation, is that enough or should I use 256M?
> 
> adam

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.