STUN RFC3489 vs 5389

[Diane Trout]

Hello,

I was having trouble using kde-telepathy call-ui (using farstream 0.1) to call 
jitsi over xmpp on a NATted network. I was able to have jitsi call itself, and 
a nokia N9. 

I packet sniffed and discovered that jitsi was using the RFC5389 version of 
STUN, while ktp-call-ui + farstream was using the RFC3489 version. 

Most of the documentation about STUN say the older version doesn't work very 
well. It looks like libnice supports both versions, 

Has anyone considered doing something like this? (No idea if the AGENT_USAGE 
flags are a good idea or not).

Diane

diff --git a/transmitters/rawudp/fs-rawudp-component.c 
b/transmitters/rawudp/fs-rawudp-component.c
index 156450c..25fa8ca 100644
--- a/transmitters/rawudp/fs-rawudp-component.c
+++ b/transmitters/rawudp/fs-rawudp-component.c
@@ -509,7 +509,9 @@ fs_rawudp_component_init (FsRawUdpComponent *self)
   self->priv->associate_on_source = TRUE;
 
   stun_agent_init (&self->priv->stun_agent,
-      STUN_ALL_KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES, STUN_COMPATIBILITY_RFC3489, 0);
+      STUN_ALL_KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES, 
+      STUN_COMPATIBILITY_RFC5389, 
+      STUN_AGENT_USAGE_ADD_SOFTWARE | STUN_AGENT_USAGE_USE_FINGERPRINT);
 
 #ifdef HAVE_GUPNP
   self->priv->upnp_mapping = TRUE;