Preparing for a stable branch of flatpak
Stephan Bergmann
sbergman at redhat.com
Wed Nov 30 16:20:44 UTC 2016
On 11/30/2016 05:07 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> The current names are quite long, but they are obviously unique. Using
> something like ".app" is more likely to conflict with other apps or be
> seen as too generic. What do people think about the short forms "*.fpa"
> and "*.fpr" instead?
My spontaneous reaction is that .flatpakrepo and .flatpakref are just
fine while .fpa and .fpr are "please don't".
More information about the xdg-app
mailing list