Preparing for a stable branch of flatpak

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 11/30/2016 05:07 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> The current names are quite long, but they are obviously unique. Using
> something like ".app" is more likely to conflict with other apps or be
> seen as too generic. What do people think about the short forms "*.fpa"
> and "*.fpr" instead?

My spontaneous reaction is that .flatpakrepo and .flatpakref are just 
fine while .fpa and .fpr are "please don't".