Digging ARM, old gcc
Alexander Larsson
alexl at redhat.com
Tue Jul 25 07:31:06 UTC 2017
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 18:47 +0200, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been pulling the thread on the QtWebEngine again now that 5.9
> was
> released and found a different issue:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-61846
>
> In this bug report Kofler suggests that our gcc (6.2.0) may be having
> an issue, do you know if we could maybe be shipping a newer one? I
> don't see an advantage in having an old compiler.
> I'm not sure which version fixes the issue, if you think it's worth
> it
> I can figure it out.
We inherit gcc from the yocto base, and while there is nothing that
prohibits us from fixin particular bugs in that I don't want to just
change to a massively different version, because that could expose
issues (build and runtime) in other parts of the runtime. I want to use
the same version that upstream yocto tested against.
However, I know there is one arm specific thing in our compilers that
is a bit different from what is common. It does not enable "thumb" mode
by default. That causes some issues with GtkWebkit i believe. You can
try adding -mthumb to CPPFLAGS and see if this affects anything.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl at redhat.com alexander.larsson at gmail.com
He's a jaded one-eyed senator haunted by memories of 'Nam. She's a
scantily clad nymphomaniac mercenary who believes she is the
reincarnation of an ancient Egyptian queen. They fight crime!
More information about the Flatpak
mailing list