Flatpak Digest, Vol 27, Issue 7

[Gunnar Andersson]

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 14:35 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:

> However, that is going to require more people being involved in flatpak
> development, because otherwise we will not have enough reviewing going
> on. Are there some people who have time to sign up for doing some level
> of flatpak PR review?

Very limited time for this but as a user/adopter I should pitch in.

I expect I do not know the technology well enough to comfortably approve the
technical details at first, but if it is at all useful I could pitch in
regularly on something like commit quality review, like:

1. Make sure commits are following formats and are properly documented (if I
don't understand it, I'll ask for a better description)

2. Based on diverse development experience I hope I'd be able to at least
point out if any commits ought to be split or squashed.

Flatpak seems quite well aligned with GNOME, so would it use the same policy
[1], more or less?

Of course the technical reviewers could also check those things, so if this
is not what the project needs right now, no problem.

Cheers,
- Gunnar

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages

-- 
Gunnar Andersson <gandersson at genivi.org>
Development Lead
GENIVI Alliance