2 machines, 1 flatpak working, other not

Neal Becker ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 20:04:28 UTC 2019


That worked!

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 4:01 PM Jorge García <jgarciao at gmail.com> wrote:

> According to this issue <https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1450>
> some people fixed it deleting and adding again the flathub repo:
>
> flatpak remote-delete --force flathub
> flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists flathub
> https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:21 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks!
>> I think this may point to the problem:
>> flatpak update --appstream
>> Updating appstream data for remote fedora
>> Updating appstream data for remote flathub
>> Error updating: Error updating appstream2: Unable to load summary from
>> remote flathub: GPG signatures found, but none are in trusted keyring;
>> Error updating appstream: Unable to load summary from remote flathub:
>> GPG signatures found, but none are in trusted keyring
>>
>> Know how to fix this?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:00 PM Jorge García <jgarciao at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > You can obtain more info about the remotes with the -d flag
>> >
>> > $ flatpak remotes -d
>> > Name                                Title                 URL
>>                                Collection ID Priority Options
>> > fedora                              -                     oci+
>> https://registry.fedoraproject.org      -             1        system,oci
>> > flathub                             Flathub
>> https://dl.flathub.org/repo/                -             1        system
>> >
>> > Also you can run this command to "refresh" the remote information:
>> > flatpak update --appstream
>> >
>> > Finally, you can get a list of the contents of the remote. This should
>> return a long list of apps and runtimes
>> > flatpak remote-ls --system flathub
>> >
>> >
>> > I hope you find what's not properly working.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jorge
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:01 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No both machines are x86_64
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 11:57 AM Marius Gedminas <marius at gedmin.as>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:28:09AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> >>> > I have 2 machines running fedora 30.  On one flatpak works as
>> >>> > expected.
>> >>> ...
>> >>> > On the 2nd machine it finds little:
>> >>> > ssh nbecker7 flatpak search visual
>> >>> > Meld Compare and merge your files org.gnome.meld 3.20.1 stable
>> fedora
>> >>> > gitg Graphical user interface for git org.gnome.gitg 3.32.1 stable
>> fedora
>> >>> > [ nothing else ]
>> >>> ...
>> >>> > Any ideas what could be wrong?  It looks like both machines include
>> >>> > 'flathub' as a source, which is where we should find 'visual studio
>> >>> > code', but search only shows it on 1 machine and not the 2nd.
>> >>>
>> >>> Are machine architectures different?  E.g. is the second machine
>> running
>> >>> a 32-bit OS?
>> >>>
>> >>> Marius Gedminas
>> >>> --
>> >>> I heard the story of an assembly programmer who put several ret
>> instructions at
>> >>> the end of a subroutine... and more, for longer subroutines, because
>> of
>> >>> "momentum".
>> >>>         -- 9ren on reddit
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Flatpak mailing list
>> >>> Flatpak at lists.freedesktop.org
>> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/flatpak
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Flatpak mailing list
>> >> Flatpak at lists.freedesktop.org
>> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/flatpak
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/attachments/20190813/6ec8f52d/attachment.html>


More information about the Flatpak mailing list