Is it possible to add libgee to Builder bundle? May be on 3.20.2 released. While Builder depends on Vala, many other app and libraries like GXml depends on libgee. While this doesn't solve my issue, will help others to use Builder in their favorite distribution with the help of xdg-app. <div class="gmail_quote">El abr. 28, 2016 6:57 AM, "Alexander Larsson" <<a href="mailto:alexl@redhat.com">alexl@redhat.com</a>> escribió: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On tor, 2016-04-28 at 06:38 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Is it possible to reuse OSTree Sdk, create a branch, make it > read/write and use it as a place where you can install your > dependencies. Its possible to create a new runtime based on a previous one. This is how e.g. the gnome runtime is built from the freedesktop runtime. However, it is not something regular users should do. Creating a runtime is technically equivalent to creating your own distro (a distro fork in this case) and you'd be doing full-time distro-style security maintainance instead of working on your app. So, don't do that. The idea with xdg-app is that you bundle dependencies with the *app*, not create your own runtimes. We want a very small set of well maintained runtimes. > Is it possible to use xdg-app to distribute libraries? A kind of > plugin to Sdk, where authors of libraries, like me, is able to > distribute new versions to develop against. As a library author, you should strive to make it easy for your downstream users to bundle your library. Maybe ship an example xdg-app- builder json snippet to show how it can look. > > pp instances, which is > not possible, so we need some kind of portal that allows builder to > launch such recursive instances. > Is that possible or planning? Should be great for any one using a box > requiring not just develop, but have an stable system for day to day > work. Like me, I'm using Debian, and may consider Red Hat EL, to do > my day work, as stable environment, but I'm unable to use jhbuild. I > would not re-consider to go to Ubuntu 16.04, I want to be away if it, > but need some good alternative. No Fedora, I've tested and makes my > system unstable, non-continuous environment, because I have to update > 6 to 8 months later, and I need some thing with more time, but > allowing to develop upstream on libgda and GXml. Yeah, we want to do this eventually. gnome-software can already (i think) build apps in xdg-app sandboxes and launch them there, its just problematic when gnome-builder itself is sandboxed. Unfortunately a lot of other stuff has come up recently that I've been working on, so I have not really had time to work on the portals. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc <a href="mailto:alexl@redhat.com">alexl@redhat.com</a> <a href="mailto:alexander.larsson@gmail.com">alexander.larsson@gmail.com</a> He's an otherworldly arachnophobic dwarf from the 'hood. She's a sharp-shooting streetsmart doctor looking for love in all the wrong places. They fight crime! </blockquote></div>