<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - noto-cjk takes 12 seconds to parse" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103291#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - noto-cjk takes 12 seconds to parse" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103291">bug 103291</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:freedesktop@behdad.org" title="Behdad Esfahbod <freedesktop@behdad.org>"> Behdad Esfahbod</a> <pre>(In reply to Alban Browaeys from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103291#c5">comment #5</a>) > I have to admit the numbers are with strace wrapping evince-thumbnailer > which slows down the process quite a lot. > With the master branch 3 seconds under strace v more than 15 seconds with or > without strace for 2.12 one ! > Mind that Gnome do run the thumbnailers in a Bubblewrap sandbox (thus no > fontconfig cache as /var is not bind mounted). > So did I in my tests to nail down why evince-thumbnailer failed on me. That sounds bad... Does the flatpak effort with fontconfig cache sharing also address bubblewrap usecase?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>