<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - fontconfig requires nano second precison for fontcache" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103652#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - fontconfig requires nano second precison for fontcache" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103652">bug 103652</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:iain@orangesquash.org.uk" title="Iain Lane <iain@orangesquash.org.uk>"> Iain Lane</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=138578" name="attach_138578" title="cache: If nsec is zero, don't use it for comparisons">attachment 138578</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=138578&action=edit" title="cache: If nsec is zero, don't use it for comparisons">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=103652&attachment=138578'>[review]</a> cache: If nsec is zero, don't use it for comparisons I made a (stupid?) patch. Is this a reliable way to go about falling back from nsec to non-nsec? I couldn't find a way to actually ask the question of the system directly. We're particularly interested because this is a big cause of live image boot slowness on Ubuntu. This patch works as intended; the cache isn't regenerated on live system boot any more.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>