[Fontconfig] fontconfig 2.1.91
otaylor at redhat.com
Wed Mar 5 03:57:33 EST 2003
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 11:40, Dan Egnor wrote:
> > By default, only X font directories containing outlines are included
> > in fonts.conf now; the bitmap fonts are generally more of an annoyance
> > than a help.
> Eep. What about everyone's favorite, misc-fixed? I hate to have to
> tell users that they have to mess with their system configuration (or
> install a ~/.fonts.conf) to get the full complement of X11 fonts.
Red Hat ships a special bitmap-fonts package which installs
a small set of selected bitmap fonts in /usr/share/fonts
(misc-fixed and lucidasanstypewriter)
> In what way are the bitmap fonts an annoyance?
* It's really confusing/bad if bitmap helvetica (etc.) are
in the set of fonts you are matching against.
* The bitmap fonts don't necessarily fall into nice families.
* A lot of the bitmap fonts just clutter up the list of fonts,
and aren't anything that a user would want to select.
(open look cursor would be an extreme example.)
* Plus the bitmap fonts in the X11 font directories are
.pcf.gz, the .gz backend in FreeType isn't really mature
yet, and is always going to be slow.
More information about the Fontconfig