[Fontconfig] Attitude to patches made by firefly

[Funda Wang]

Ambrose> Also in the process, I found a number of different glyphs
Ambrose> (obviously for "shape differences" between different languages)
Ambrose> where I cannot notice any difference at all even if I look very
Ambrose> hard, or the difference is so small I can't believe even the
Ambrose> Japanese will complain.
Check these character: "起"，"非"。 You might paste them into your
favourite font viewing program. Try to show them under different fonts, 
such as AR PL Sung GB and AR PL Ming BIG5.

Ambrose> My own conclusion is, to the Chinese, the "shape difference" is
Ambrose> an artificial myth. (After all, all these different shapes are
Ambrose> valid in Chinese, either as an old form, a variant form, or as
Ambrose> a "popular but written incorrectly" form.)
It seems that only Unicode UTF-16 can solve this problem.