[Fontconfig] [PATCH] never try to validate cache files when using
plam at MIT.EDU
Thu Feb 2 11:50:43 PST 2006
Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:47, Patrick Lam wrote:
>> if (!force && FcDirCacheValid (dir) && FcDirCacheHasCurrentArch (dir))
>>checks for cache validity and ought to ensure that -f will try to save
>>the cache files. Of course it might fail for some other reason.
> Hmm, indeed. but I want one switch to make sure no corrupt cache files stay
> around, as we have way too many problems with them.
It would be great to have a --really-force flag, then. The man page
doesn't think about the issues involved in multiarch cache files.
>>-f works for me. Does it not work for you? What should the semantics
>>of -f be? Perhaps there should be -f and --really-force, which would
>>always remove cache files; that's certainly not what we want to give
>>when we make install.
> what does make install have to do with it (curious)? Indeed, the normal
> behaviour whould be to just run "fc-cache" I think.
make install runs fc-cache -f -v, as I'd imagine postinst scripts would
More information about the Fontconfig