[Fontconfig] bug status for 2.4 release
keithp at keithp.com
Sun Sep 3 12:31:50 PDT 2006
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 12:59 -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> writes:
> >> local.conf should probably also be done that way, then, too.
> Keith> Yes, you're right, although 'local.conf' is fairly deprecated these days
> Keith> with conf.d available.
> Good point. Perhaps a good time, then, to complete the deprecation?
Ah, perhaps. Although, it's reasonably harmless to continue to include
it, perhaps from a file in conf.d
> Good question. I see that there is no general consensus among the
> distributions for, as an example, apache setups. Some use .avail
> and .enabled; some use just .d. But I rather prefer .avail/.enabled.
I think we're fairly well stuck with 'conf.d' for now, but we can
install our supported configuration files in conf.avail.
Can you get this working for the 2.4 release?
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20060903/108de7e2/attachment.pgp
More information about the Fontconfig