[Fontconfig] fc-query output, misunderstanding?

[Akira TAGOH]

I'm not sure if I understand a question properly though, U+E059 should
appears on the output of fc-query when available:

00e0: 00000000 00000000 02000000 ....

details:
0xe059 >> 8  = 0xe0
0xe059 & 0xff / 32 = 2 (+1 column)
0xe059 & 0x1f = 25 (bit)

It's the position for U+E059.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know who might answer this question please?
>  Another list perhaps?
>
> TIA Dave
>
> On 15 January 2012 10:00, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have an otf font, for which fc-query gives me
>> (aft converting to python format)
>> font=[
>> ["0000", "00000000","ffffffff","ffffffff","7fffffff","00000000","ffffdffe","ffffffff","ffffffff"],
>> ["0001", "ffffffff","feffffff","ffffffff","ffffffff","00040000","00818003","00000000","fc300000"],
>> ["0002", "03000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00040000","01850000","3f0000c0","00000008"],
>> ["0003", "00040200","00000008","00000000","44300000","ffffd7f0","fffffffb","44637fff","00000001"],
>> ["0004", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","000c0000","000000c0"],
>> ["001e", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","0000003f","ffffffff","ffffffff","03ffffff"],
>> ["001f", "3f3fffff","ffffffff","aaff3f3f","3fffffff","ffffffff","ffdfffff","efcfffdf","7fdcffff"],
>> ["0020", "7fff0bf4","560d0067","00000010","fff10000","00007fff","0000109e","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["0021", "00480020","00004044","fff80000","00000000","00200000","00000100","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["0022", "44068044","00000f80","00000120","00000033","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["0023", "00010000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["0025", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000c02","00008400","00000040"],
>> ["00e0", "00000000","00000000","00000070","00000800","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
>>                                                           xxxx
>> ["00f5", "07fdffff","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["00f6", "00000000","fe000000","7fe30007","ffffe7fe","ffffffff","000c3fff","3001ce08","ffffff15"],
>> ["00f7", "00000000","83ff0052","00000000","07ffffff","00000000","81108102","00000000","ff7fffff"],
>> ["00fb", "0000001f","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"],
>> ["00ff", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","10000000"]]
>>
>> Am I understanding this right please?
>>  I'm trying to generate a glyph for all those present.
>>
>> My formatter says no such character where (I think) this map says there is one.
>> E.g. E059
>> Row e0
>> Group 3 (e040-e05f)
>> character 6 (numbering 0..7)
>> which is the 7.
>> On which basis (my understanding)
>> EO58  -
>> EO59 present
>> EO5A present
>> EO5B present
>>
>> Am I interpreting this correctly please?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Pawson
>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>> Docbook FAQ.
>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> Fontconfig mailing list
> Fontconfig at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig



-- 
Akira TAGOH