[Fontconfig] Prgname and font-features?

[Akira TAGOH]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org> wrote:

> I don't think we should validate.  Just pass data around.  Should we call
> it
> OT_FEATURES or more generically FONT_FEATURES?  If and when we add AAT
> support
> (or the existing Graphite support), those backends will use these same
> tags as
> far as HarfBuzz API is concerned.  CSS calls them font-features, that's
> why I
> chose that.
>

Aha. that sounds good then. let's call it FONT_FEATURES.


> Right.  That's why I've been putting this off.  I need to extend the
> PangoAttribute framework to allow "reducing" a set of attributes to a
> single
> value, in this case, add the lists of features together or something.
>

Right. that too.


> Ok, I'll push it up.  Any name preference? FC_PRGNAME is fine?  Should
> DefaultSubstitute try to populate that using system-specific heuristics?
> (/proc/self/exe or something)
>

Yep sounds good to me.


>
>
> behdad
>



-- 
Akira TAGOH
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20130111/dc22ae4f/attachment.html>