[Fontconfig] On the order of test and edit elements in a match

[Raimund Steger]

Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Raimund Steger <rs at mytum.de
> <mailto:rs at mytum.de>> wrote:
>
>     Why not...
>     Since interleaved <test> and <edit> were previously not even allowed
>     by the DTD, it shouldn't have any real impact on existing configs.
>     OK it was tolerated by fontconfig but I can't imagine this was
>     exploited by anyone...
>
>
> That should be a bug if one expected it. so that should be no problem.
>
> FWIW currently fonts.dtd says:
>
>   <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit*)>
>
> just wonder how useful marking "edit" as zero-or-more state is? it
> doesn't take any effects. we can simply ignore it. so shouldn't it be:
>
>   <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit+)>
>
> and for this proposal:
>
>   <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit+)+>
>
> any comments?

looks good to me.

Raimund


-- 
Worringer Str 31 Duesseldorf 40211 DE  home: <rs at mytum.de>
+49-179-2981632 icq 16845346           work: <rs at interface-ag.de>