[Fontconfig] Can we use base 16, and not 85, for ASCII charset representations?

W. Trevor King wking at tremily.us
Mon Sep 23 12:00:58 PDT 2013

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:52:01PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 13-09-23 02:47 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > 
> > I haven't had time to look this up yet, but I imagine fontconfig 
> > currently only matches charsets exactly.  It would be nice to search for
> > “all fonts containing at least <charset>”.
> Your imagination differs from reality :).

Oh good :).  Does that mean that the logic is already what I want?


This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20130923/8fa74377/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Fontconfig mailing list