[Fontconfig] Next steps for a reproducible Fontconfig?

[Akira TAGOH]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:55 PM Alexander Larsson
<alexander.larsson at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that cache path is wrong as we have something else by that name.
>
> host-path kinda hardcodes the sandbox case for rewriting though. Maybe
> "remapped-path"?

"remap" looks redundant to the element name. simply "to" or "as" as
you proposed that earlier?

-- 
Akira TAGOH