[PATCH v2 03/11] drm/msm: adreno: move features bits in a separate variable

Rob Clark robdclark at gmail.com
Thu Nov 21 19:48:28 UTC 2024


On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:44 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:54:24AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:18 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > Now the features defines have the right name, introduce a features
> > > > bitfield and move the features defines in it, fixing all code checking
> > > > for them.
> > > >
> > > > No functional changes intended.
> > >
> > > I think it might be better to squahs this patch into the previous one,
> > > it would simplify checking that we use .quirks for ADRENO_QUIRK_foo and
> > > .features for ADRENO_FEAT_bar.
> > >
> >
> > IMHO better to keep this separated
>
> If they are separated, it is easy to overlook presense of a statement
> checking .quirks against ADRENO_FEAT_bar.

Maybe just drop this patch.. we don't really have so many
quirks+features so a single bitmask is fine and avoids this
wrong-bitmask-problem in the first place.

BR,
-R

> >
> > But we don't have _that_ many features/quirks so I don't find
> > combining them all that problematic
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry


More information about the Freedreno mailing list