[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/msm/dp: Introduce link training per-segment for LTTPRs
Aleksandrs Vinarskis
alex.vinarskis at gmail.com
Tue Apr 8 22:29:42 UTC 2025
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 02:55, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 12:38:04AM +0100, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
> > DisplayPort requires per-segment link training when LTTPR are switched
> > to non-transparent mode, starting with LTTPR closest to the source.
> > Only when each segment is trained individually, source can link train
> > to sink.
> >
> > Implement per-segment link traning when LTTPR(s) are detected, to
> > support external docking stations. On higher level, changes are:
> >
> > * Pass phy being trained down to all required helpers
> > * Run CR, EQ link training per phy
> > * Set voltage swing, pre-emphasis levels per phy
> >
> > This ensures successful link training both when connected directly to
> > the monitor (single LTTPR onboard most X1E laptops) and via the docking
> > station (at least two LTTPRs).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis at gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 4 +-
> > 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > index d8633a596f8d..419a519ccf6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct msm_dp_ctrl_private {
> > struct msm_dp_link *link;
> > struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog;
> >
> > + int *lttpr_count;
>
> Please move lttpr_count to msm_dp_ctrl or msm_dp_link. It would remove a
> need for this ugly pointer.
Thanks for your review,
Sure, will move it.
>
> > +
> > struct phy *phy;
> >
> > unsigned int num_core_clks;
> > @@ -1034,9 +1036,11 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_set_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > +static int msm_dp_ctrl_update_phy_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > + enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > {
> > struct msm_dp_link *link = ctrl->link;
> > + int reg = DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET;
> > int ret = 0, lane, lane_cnt;
> > u8 buf[4];
> > u32 max_level_reached = 0;
> > @@ -1075,8 +1079,11 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> >
> > drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "sink: p|v=0x%x\n",
> > voltage_swing_level | pre_emphasis_level);
> > - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(ctrl->aux, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
> > - buf, lane_cnt);
> > +
> > + if (dp_phy != DP_PHY_DPRX)
> > + reg = DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET_PHY_REPEATER(dp_phy);
>
> Please always init reg here rather than using a default value above.
> It's a cleaner code IMO.
Will fix.
>
> > +
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(ctrl->aux, reg, buf, lane_cnt);
> > if (ret == lane_cnt)
> > ret = 0;
> >
> > @@ -1084,9 +1091,10 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > }
> >
> > static bool msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > - u8 pattern)
> > + u8 pattern, enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > {
> > u8 buf;
> > + int reg = DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "sink: pattern=%x\n", pattern);
> > @@ -1096,7 +1104,10 @@ static bool msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > if (pattern && pattern != DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_4)
> > buf |= DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE;
> >
> > - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(ctrl->aux, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET, buf);
> > + if (dp_phy != DP_PHY_DPRX)
> > + reg = DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET_PHY_REPEATER(dp_phy);
>
> The same comment here.
Will fix.
>
> > +
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(ctrl->aux, reg, buf);
> > return ret == 1;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1115,12 +1126,16 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_read_link_status(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > }
> >
> > static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > - int *training_step)
> > + int *training_step, enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > {
> > + int delay_us;
> > int tries, old_v_level, ret = 0;
> > u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> > int const maximum_retries = 4;
> >
> > + delay_us = drm_dp_read_clock_recovery_delay(ctrl->aux,
> > + ctrl->panel->dpcd, dp_phy, false);
> > +
> > msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_state_ctrl(ctrl->catalog, 0);
> >
> > *training_step = DP_TRAINING_1;
> > @@ -1129,18 +1144,19 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(ctrl, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> > - DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE);
> > + DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE, dp_phy);
> >
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(ctrl->link);
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_phy_vx_px(ctrl, dp_phy);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > tries = 0;
> > old_v_level = ctrl->link->phy_params.v_level;
> > for (tries = 0; tries < maximum_retries; tries++) {
> > - drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(ctrl->aux, ctrl->panel->dpcd);
> > + fsleep(delay_us);
> >
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_read_link_status(ctrl, link_status);
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status(ctrl->aux, dp_phy, link_status);
>
> Please rebase this code on top of drm-misc-next.
What is the relation of drm-misc-next to linux-next? When rebasing on
top of drm-misc-next, I lose all displays including internal one. Same
if just build drm-misc-next without this series with config imported
from linux-next. I could of course address comments, test on
linux-next and then rebase before submitting, but that sounds wrong.
```
auxiliary aux_bridge.aux_bridge.0: deferred probe pending:
aux_bridge.aux_bridge: failed to acquire drm_bridge
auxiliary aux_bridge.aux_bridge.1: deferred probe pending:
aux_bridge.aux_bridge: failed to acquire drm_bridge
```
>
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1161,7 +1177,7 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > }
> >
> > msm_dp_link_adjust_levels(ctrl->link, link_status);
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(ctrl);
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_phy_vx_px(ctrl, dp_phy);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -1213,21 +1229,31 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_lane_down_shift(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > +static void msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > + enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > {
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(ctrl, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_DISABLE);
> > - drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay(ctrl->aux, ctrl->panel->dpcd);
> > + int delay_us;
> > +
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(ctrl, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_DISABLE, dp_phy);
> > +
> > + delay_us = drm_dp_read_channel_eq_delay(ctrl->aux,
> > + ctrl->panel->dpcd, dp_phy, false);
>
> Misaligned, checkpatch should warn about it.
Will fix, somehow overlooked it.
>
> > + fsleep(delay_us);
> > }
> >
> > static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > - int *training_step)
> > + int *training_step, enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > {
> > + int delay_us;
> > int tries = 0, ret = 0;
> > u8 pattern;
> > u32 state_ctrl_bit;
> > int const maximum_retries = 5;
> > u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> >
> > + delay_us = drm_dp_read_channel_eq_delay(ctrl->aux,
> > + ctrl->panel->dpcd, dp_phy, false);
>
> Misaligned
Will fix.
>
> > +
> > msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_state_ctrl(ctrl->catalog, 0);
> >
> > *training_step = DP_TRAINING_2;
> > @@ -1247,12 +1273,12 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(ctrl, pattern);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(ctrl, pattern, dp_phy);
> >
> > for (tries = 0; tries <= maximum_retries; tries++) {
> > - drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay(ctrl->aux, ctrl->panel->dpcd);
> > + fsleep(delay_us);
> >
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_read_link_status(ctrl, link_status);
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status(ctrl->aux, dp_phy, link_status);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1262,7 +1288,7 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > }
> >
> > msm_dp_link_adjust_levels(ctrl->link, link_status);
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(ctrl);
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_update_phy_vx_px(ctrl, dp_phy);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1271,10 +1297,32 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > }
> >
> > +static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > + int *training_step, enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1(ctrl, training_step, dp_phy);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("link training #1 on phy %d failed. ret=%d\n", dp_phy, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "link training #1 on phy %d successful\n", dp_phy);
> > +
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(ctrl, training_step, dp_phy);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("link training #2 on phy %d failed. ret=%d\n", dp_phy, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "link training #2 on phy %d successful\n", dp_phy);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > int *training_step)
> > {
> > - int ret = 0;
> > + int ret = 0, i;
>
> Don't mix initialized and non-initialized variables in the same line.
Will fix.
>
> > const u8 *dpcd = ctrl->panel->dpcd;
> > u8 encoding[] = { 0, DP_SET_ANSI_8B10B };
> > u8 assr;
> > @@ -1286,8 +1334,6 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > link_info.rate = ctrl->link->link_params.rate;
> > link_info.capabilities = DP_LINK_CAP_ENHANCED_FRAMING;
> >
> > - msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(ctrl->link);
> > -
> > msm_dp_aux_link_configure(ctrl->aux, &link_info);
> >
> > if (drm_dp_max_downspread(dpcd))
> > @@ -1302,23 +1348,29 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_train(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> > &assr, 1);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1(ctrl, training_step);
> > + for (i = *ctrl->lttpr_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy = DP_PHY_LTTPR(i);
> > +
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2(ctrl, training_step, dp_phy);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, dp_phy);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (ret) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("link training #1 failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
> > + DRM_ERROR("link training of LTTPR(s) failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
> > goto end;
> > }
> >
> > - /* print success info as this is a result of user initiated action */
> > - drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "link training #1 successful\n");
> > -
> > - ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_2(ctrl, training_step);
> > + ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2(ctrl, training_step, DP_PHY_DPRX);
> > if (ret) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("link training #2 failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
> > + DRM_ERROR("link training on sink failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
> > goto end;
> > }
> >
> > /* print success info as this is a result of user initiated action */
> > - drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "link training #2 successful\n");
> > + drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev, "link training on sink successful\n");
> >
>
> No need for keeping these debug messages, you have them in
> msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2().
Will drop.
>
> > end:
> > msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_state_ctrl(ctrl->catalog, 0);
> > @@ -1636,7 +1688,7 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_link_maintenance(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > if (ret)
> > goto end;
> >
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
> >
> > msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_state_ctrl(ctrl->catalog, DP_STATE_CTRL_SEND_VIDEO);
> >
> > @@ -1660,7 +1712,7 @@ static bool msm_dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> > return false;
> > }
> > msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_send_phy_pattern(ctrl->catalog, pattern_requested);
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_update_phy_vx_px(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
> > msm_dp_link_send_test_response(ctrl->link);
> >
> > pattern_sent = msm_dp_catalog_ctrl_read_phy_pattern(ctrl->catalog);
> > @@ -1902,7 +1954,7 @@ int msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl)
> > }
> >
> > /* stop link training before start re training */
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
>
> Just DPRX or should this include all LTTPRs? Could you point out how
> this is handled inside Intel or AMD drivers?
Just DPRX since this call follows `rc =
msm_dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, &training_step);` [1], which in turn
calls `msm_dp_ctrl_link_train` [2].
The latter one with the proposed changes will attempt to Train
LTTPRx->Clear training pattern on LTTPRx->Proceed. Finally, it will
attempt to Train DPRX, without cleaning the training pattern:
```
for (i = *ctrl->lttpr_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy = DP_PHY_LTTPR(i);
ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2(ctrl, training_step, dp_phy);
msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, dp_phy);
if (ret)
break;
}
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("link training of LTTPR(s) failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
goto end;
}
ret = msm_dp_ctrl_link_train_1_2(ctrl, training_step, DP_PHY_DPRX);
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("link training on sink failed. ret=%d\n", ret);
goto end;
}
```
The reason for not clearing training pattern on DPRX right after
training like with LTTPRs appears to be needed for compliance, as it
should only be cleared right before stream starts [3]:
```
if (ctrl->link->sink_request & DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN)
return rc;
if (rc == 0) { /* link train successfully */
/*
* do not stop train pattern here
* stop link training at on_stream
* to pass compliance test
*/
} else {
/*
* link training failed
* end txing train pattern here
*/
msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
msm_dp_ctrl_deinitialize_mainlink(ctrl);
rc = -ECONNRESET;
}
```
Intel does a somewhat similar approach - they have
`intel_dp_link_train_all_phys` function [4] which would Train
LTTPRx->Clear dpcd training pattern on LTTPRx->Proceed, and finally
train DPRX but not disable training pattern. DPRX's training is
disabled separately in the `intel_dp_stop_link_train` [5] at a much
later stage.
The difference to msm's drm driver is that in case of link training
failure, Intel schedules software hpd event [6] and exists, while msm
stops and restarts training with reduced parameters internally (this
very function), hence it appears more than once.
[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c#L1856
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c#L1273
[3] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c#L1917-L1932
[4] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c#L1338-L1364
[5] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c#L1107-L1136
[6] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.14/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c#L1313-L1336
>
> > }
> >
> > rc = msm_dp_ctrl_reinitialize_mainlink(ctrl);
> > @@ -1926,7 +1978,7 @@ int msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl)
> > * link training failed
> > * end txing train pattern here
> > */
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
>
> The same.
>
> >
> > msm_dp_ctrl_deinitialize_mainlink(ctrl);
> > rc = -ECONNRESET;
> > @@ -1997,7 +2049,7 @@ int msm_dp_ctrl_on_stream(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl, bool force_link_train
> > msm_dp_ctrl_link_retrain(ctrl);
> >
> > /* stop txing train pattern to end link training */
> > - msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl);
> > + msm_dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(ctrl, DP_PHY_DPRX);
> >
> > /*
> > * Set up transfer unit values and set controller state to send
> > @@ -2207,7 +2259,7 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_clk_init(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl)
> >
> > struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl_get(struct device *dev, struct msm_dp_link *link,
> > struct msm_dp_panel *panel, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> > - struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog,
> > + struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog, int *lttpr_count,
> > struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
> > @@ -2242,12 +2294,13 @@ struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl_get(struct device *dev, struct msm_dp_link *link
> > init_completion(&ctrl->video_comp);
> >
> > /* in parameters */
> > - ctrl->panel = panel;
> > - ctrl->aux = aux;
> > - ctrl->link = link;
> > - ctrl->catalog = catalog;
> > - ctrl->dev = dev;
> > - ctrl->phy = phy;
> > + ctrl->panel = panel;
> > + ctrl->aux = aux;
> > + ctrl->link = link;
> > + ctrl->catalog = catalog;
> > + ctrl->dev = dev;
> > + ctrl->phy = phy;
> > + ctrl->lttpr_count = lttpr_count;
>
> I'd rather reduce noise and keep old assignments intact.
Actually, taking into account the very first comment of your review,
this change will drop all together.
Thanks,
Will be sending updated version shortly,
Alex
>
> >
> > ret = msm_dp_ctrl_clk_init(&ctrl->msm_dp_ctrl);
> > if (ret) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
> > index b7abfedbf574..3fb45b138b31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ irqreturn_t msm_dp_ctrl_isr(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl);
> > void msm_dp_ctrl_handle_sink_request(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl);
> > struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl_get(struct device *dev, struct msm_dp_link *link,
> > struct msm_dp_panel *panel, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> > - struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog,
> > + struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog, int *lttpr_count,
> > struct phy *phy);
> >
> > void msm_dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(struct msm_dp_ctrl *msm_dp_ctrl, bool enable);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > index d0c2dc7e6648..393ce3479a7e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct msm_dp_display_private {
> > struct msm_dp_event event_list[DP_EVENT_Q_MAX];
> > spinlock_t event_lock;
> >
> > + int lttpr_count;
> > u8 lttpr_common_caps[DP_LTTPR_COMMON_CAP_SIZE];
> >
> > bool wide_bus_supported;
> > @@ -397,7 +398,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> > if (rc)
> > goto end;
> >
> > - msm_dp_display_lttpr_init(dp, dpcd);
> > + dp->lttpr_count = msm_dp_display_lttpr_init(dp, dpcd);
> >
> > rc = msm_dp_panel_read_sink_caps(dp->panel, dp->lttpr_common_caps, connector);
> > if (rc)
> > @@ -798,6 +799,7 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> >
> > dp->ctrl = msm_dp_ctrl_get(dev, dp->link, dp->panel, dp->aux,
> > dp->catalog,
> > + &dp->lttpr_count,
> > phy);
> > if (IS_ERR(dp->ctrl)) {
> > rc = PTR_ERR(dp->ctrl);
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
More information about the Freedreno
mailing list